Ceflies. One population, consisting of a vial containing 203 flies two days of age was illuminated with 312 nm UV light using a UV lamp (NB-UVB 31113 nm, ATObeam, Goyang, Korea; UVB lamp, PL-S 9 W/01, Phillips, Netherlands), 365 nm UV light (LF-204.LS UVlite ultraviolet lamps, UVITEC, Cambridge, UK), or with white light from a DG4 Xenon arc lamp (Sutter, CA, USA) at a distance of 2.5 cm in the standing vial, whilst the other group, which had a equivalent number of flies, was permitted to feed freely and was left untreated in the identical time (Figure 1c). Irradiance was measured as 1.eight, 4, and 57.1 mW/cm2for UVA, UVB, and white light, respectively, using an excised piece of a vial covering the photodiode probe (S120VC, Thorlabs, NJ, USA) to simulate internal irradiation. The vials had been made of polypropylene, which features a low rate of UV transmission (Kruenate et al., 2004), resulting in elevated internal temperature, as described in Figure 1–figure supplement three. To reduce thermal accumulation, the UV-illuminated vial was actively cooled by fan-driven air flow when the internal temperature of a separately illuminated vial was concurrently monitored. After every feeding session, the modify within the amount of the menisci of 30 mM sucrose solutions in three calibrated glass capillary tubes (#2920107, Marienfeld, Lauda-Konigshofen, 7��-Hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one Technical Information Germany, 15 mm/ml) was measured. Following measurement on the evaporated volume obtained from vials with no flies, the distance readings were converted to volume measurements. The ingested volume per animal was then employed to calculate an ‘avoidance index’ by dividing [ingested volume per fly inside the sucrose-only vial minus ingested volume per fly inside the UV-plus-sucrose vial] by the sum of ingestion volume per fly in either vial. For the Cafe assay for H2O2, two capillaries containing precisely the same answer were inserted into a vial together with two other capillaries with other tastants. The use of numerous capillaries for a single tastant mixture suppresses experimental variation, presumably owing to higher exposure of flies to tastants and an averaging effect among feeding amounts in separate tubes. To obtain an avoidance index, the volume of H2O2+sucrose consumption was subtracted from the volume of sucroseonly consumption, the result of which was in turn divided by total ingested volume.Proboscis extension reflex assayThe proboscis extension reflex (PER) assay was performed with modifications as previously described (Kang et al., 2010; Kang et al., 2012). UV or IR-induced PER was monitored in TrpA1-deficient flies expressing either TrpA1(A) or TrpA1(B) in Gr5a-Gal4 cells. Flies that had been starved overnight were glued to glass slides, water-satiated, and illuminated with 254 nm UV light at an intensity of 0.28 mW/cm2(LF-204.LS UVlite ultraviolet lamps, UVITEC Cambridge, UK) for 2 min, during which time PER frequency was scored. When a fly totally extended its proboscis 10 instances or additional, a maximum score of 1 was given. The PER score of a fly that extended its proboscis fewer than ten times was 148504-34-1 Purity & Documentation calculated by dividing the number of proboscis extensions by 10. For IR-evoked PER, IR from a radiant heater (940 watt, JD07010-1002, iSolar, Inchon, Korea) was administered at a distance of 20 cm in the fly.UV attraction behaviorUVA radiation at 365 nm was administered for 20 s from the bottom side of a horizontally placed vial (Figure 6–figure supplement 2b) that contained 3-day-old adult flies. Attraction indices were calculated b.