Udies indicating that in only a small percentage of graft losses CNIT could be identified as the actual cause, whereas antibody-mediated rejection was explaining the majority of failures (35). Even though the evaluation of molecular profiles associated with AR was not the aim of this study, we observed differentially expressed genes and associated pathways in concordance with already described findings (36-38). Moreover, the individual analysis of IF/TA profiles was in concordance with our previous reports (39-43). Interestingly, after eliminating AR-differentially expressed genes, IF/TA Olumacostat glasaretil web samples showed important patterns of both B and T cell activation as observed in our previous reports (41,42). These immune-associated signatures were less Crotaline molecular weight prominent in tissues with CNIT, with a predominant pattern of genes associated to wound, platelet and endothelial activation. Profibrogenic profiles were present in both conditions, but exacerbated in IF/TA. These findings can be a consequence of already established damage present in these samples. However, differences were observed related to top growth factor activated signaling. Furthermore, the most important finding related with results shows that these two conditions can be differentiated at the molecular level as manifested in our expression data. This assertion is valid for both analyses, direct comparison between CNIT and IF/TA and after filtering by using same NA samples. Moreover, differences in the levels of expression of common genes were also observed. Specifically, different cell types are targets of CNIT as well as mediators of nephrotoxicity (44-47). The tubular epithelium is involved in the fibrogenesis induced by CNI, including the production of profibrotic molecules including transforming growth factor- (TGF-) (32, 48, 49). These molecules activate interstitial fibroblasts and induce the synthesis of extracellular matrix. In the present report, TGF- was found to be over-expressed in IF/TA samples when compared to NA and CNIT samples. The renal interstitium is involved in the development of fibrosis with the interstitial infiltration of macrophages (50, 51). Macropinocytosis signaling was identified as the top canonical pathway in the CNIT group, even after removing overlapping genes. Identification of potential upstream regulators and downstream effectors of CNI-induced effects might lead to development of new therapeutic interventions to avoid downstream effects. In the present project, we used IPA prediction tool for identifying up-stream regulators, limiting our analysis to those genes differentially expressed in our dataset. In the past few years the availability and robustness of pathway analysis tools has improved dramatically, allowing the identification of networks and pathways in resulting datasets.Am J Transplant. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 May 01.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptMaluf et al.PageHowever, it is important to state that these tools are seen as starting points for further analyses/evaluations. Herein, we used multiple strategies for evaluating and confirming our results. However, further evaluation and validation of these findings and predictions is required. The influence of the identified signature of CNIT in progression to CAD was evaluated in protocol biopsies collected early and at approximately 12 months post-KT. These highly selected patients showed an important contribution of the CNIT signature in.Udies indicating that in only a small percentage of graft losses CNIT could be identified as the actual cause, whereas antibody-mediated rejection was explaining the majority of failures (35). Even though the evaluation of molecular profiles associated with AR was not the aim of this study, we observed differentially expressed genes and associated pathways in concordance with already described findings (36-38). Moreover, the individual analysis of IF/TA profiles was in concordance with our previous reports (39-43). Interestingly, after eliminating AR-differentially expressed genes, IF/TA samples showed important patterns of both B and T cell activation as observed in our previous reports (41,42). These immune-associated signatures were less prominent in tissues with CNIT, with a predominant pattern of genes associated to wound, platelet and endothelial activation. Profibrogenic profiles were present in both conditions, but exacerbated in IF/TA. These findings can be a consequence of already established damage present in these samples. However, differences were observed related to top growth factor activated signaling. Furthermore, the most important finding related with results shows that these two conditions can be differentiated at the molecular level as manifested in our expression data. This assertion is valid for both analyses, direct comparison between CNIT and IF/TA and after filtering by using same NA samples. Moreover, differences in the levels of expression of common genes were also observed. Specifically, different cell types are targets of CNIT as well as mediators of nephrotoxicity (44-47). The tubular epithelium is involved in the fibrogenesis induced by CNI, including the production of profibrotic molecules including transforming growth factor- (TGF-) (32, 48, 49). These molecules activate interstitial fibroblasts and induce the synthesis of extracellular matrix. In the present report, TGF- was found to be over-expressed in IF/TA samples when compared to NA and CNIT samples. The renal interstitium is involved in the development of fibrosis with the interstitial infiltration of macrophages (50, 51). Macropinocytosis signaling was identified as the top canonical pathway in the CNIT group, even after removing overlapping genes. Identification of potential upstream regulators and downstream effectors of CNI-induced effects might lead to development of new therapeutic interventions to avoid downstream effects. In the present project, we used IPA prediction tool for identifying up-stream regulators, limiting our analysis to those genes differentially expressed in our dataset. In the past few years the availability and robustness of pathway analysis tools has improved dramatically, allowing the identification of networks and pathways in resulting datasets.Am J Transplant. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 May 01.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptMaluf et al.PageHowever, it is important to state that these tools are seen as starting points for further analyses/evaluations. Herein, we used multiple strategies for evaluating and confirming our results. However, further evaluation and validation of these findings and predictions is required. The influence of the identified signature of CNIT in progression to CAD was evaluated in protocol biopsies collected early and at approximately 12 months post-KT. These highly selected patients showed an important contribution of the CNIT signature in.