The group showing poor graft function at 24 months post-KT and histological evidence of IF/TA. Lack of differences in plasma levels of CNI between groups might indicate that allograft tissue damage is dose independent. Moreover, this group of patients also SKF-96365 (hydrochloride) site showed continuous SKF-96365 (hydrochloride)MedChemExpress SKF-96365 (hydrochloride) immunological activation, reassuring that CNIT is not the only factor associated with disease progression, but is evidently an important non-immunological feature. A higher and significant representation of genes involved in nephrotoxicity in the patient group with continuous decrease in graft function and histological evidence of IF/TA was observed, confirming our results. These findings, to the best of our knowledge, represent the first attempt to evaluate the contribution of CNIT to the development of CAD through analysis of CNI molecular signatures. Ongoing research is focusing on the validation of these results in a larger patient group and using additional experimental tools.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptSupplementary MaterialRefer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.AcknowledgmentsThe research results included in this report were supported by a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) grant, R01DK080074.AbbreviationsACR AR AMR CAD CNI CNIT IF/TA KT NA IPA acute cellular rejection acute rejection antibody mediated rejection chronic allograft dysfunction calcineurin inhibitor calcineurin inhibitor toxicity interstitial fibrosis/ tubular atrophy kidney transplantation normal allograft Ingenuity Pathway AnalysisAm J Transplant. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 May 01.Maluf et al.Page
NIH Public AccessAuthor ManuscriptPsychiatr Serv. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 April 21.Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2012 July ; 63(7): 720?21. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.20120p720.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptSupported Housing and the Lamppost–or Supported Housing in the Spotlight?Dr. Deborah K. Padgett, Ph.D. Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York CityTo the EditorHopper’s eloquent argument in the May issue regarding supported housing’s failure to remedy the social exclusion of people with serious mental illness (1) places the spotlight on one approach to the exclusion of other approaches that are far more powerful and commonly found. This purported failure, moreover, is heightened by his equating supported housing with institutions of control over the poor: “It is no reproach to note the structural kinship of supported housing and abeyance mechanisms” (1). Yet “abeyance mechanisms” such as prisons and long-stay hospitals bear a much closer resemblance to the opposite of supported housing–that is, to congregate care settings where residents share close quarters under strict house rules. By comparison, supported housing, which offers consumers their own apartment on the basis of their preferences, is a form of personal liberation. Of course, liberation does not mean salvation. And recovery from mental illness cannot be achieved (as Hopper notes) by an individual’s force of will. Social isolation is but one entrenched problem that the newly housed must confront. Cumulative life adversity–a benign-sounding term that obscures the raw brutality of being beaten or sexually assaulted– is an all-too-common precursor to the adult problems of mental illness, substance abuse, homelessness, and po.The group showing poor graft function at 24 months post-KT and histological evidence of IF/TA. Lack of differences in plasma levels of CNI between groups might indicate that allograft tissue damage is dose independent. Moreover, this group of patients also showed continuous immunological activation, reassuring that CNIT is not the only factor associated with disease progression, but is evidently an important non-immunological feature. A higher and significant representation of genes involved in nephrotoxicity in the patient group with continuous decrease in graft function and histological evidence of IF/TA was observed, confirming our results. These findings, to the best of our knowledge, represent the first attempt to evaluate the contribution of CNIT to the development of CAD through analysis of CNI molecular signatures. Ongoing research is focusing on the validation of these results in a larger patient group and using additional experimental tools.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptSupplementary MaterialRefer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.AcknowledgmentsThe research results included in this report were supported by a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) grant, R01DK080074.AbbreviationsACR AR AMR CAD CNI CNIT IF/TA KT NA IPA acute cellular rejection acute rejection antibody mediated rejection chronic allograft dysfunction calcineurin inhibitor calcineurin inhibitor toxicity interstitial fibrosis/ tubular atrophy kidney transplantation normal allograft Ingenuity Pathway AnalysisAm J Transplant. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 May 01.Maluf et al.Page
NIH Public AccessAuthor ManuscriptPsychiatr Serv. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 April 21.Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2012 July ; 63(7): 720?21. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.20120p720.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptSupported Housing and the Lamppost–or Supported Housing in the Spotlight?Dr. Deborah K. Padgett, Ph.D. Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York CityTo the EditorHopper’s eloquent argument in the May issue regarding supported housing’s failure to remedy the social exclusion of people with serious mental illness (1) places the spotlight on one approach to the exclusion of other approaches that are far more powerful and commonly found. This purported failure, moreover, is heightened by his equating supported housing with institutions of control over the poor: “It is no reproach to note the structural kinship of supported housing and abeyance mechanisms” (1). Yet “abeyance mechanisms” such as prisons and long-stay hospitals bear a much closer resemblance to the opposite of supported housing–that is, to congregate care settings where residents share close quarters under strict house rules. By comparison, supported housing, which offers consumers their own apartment on the basis of their preferences, is a form of personal liberation. Of course, liberation does not mean salvation. And recovery from mental illness cannot be achieved (as Hopper notes) by an individual’s force of will. Social isolation is but one entrenched problem that the newly housed must confront. Cumulative life adversity–a benign-sounding term that obscures the raw brutality of being beaten or sexually assaulted– is an all-too-common precursor to the adult problems of mental illness, substance abuse, homelessness, and po.