Risons to represent themselves and their experiences for the target audience. Two new concepts–analogues and foils– are introduced to describe how the young adults likened themselves to, and contrasted themselves with, various reference PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19889398 groups in their accounts. By means of these and related techniques, they created good renditions of their experiences for the audience, helping to inform and assistance others within the procedure. Keywords and phrases adolescents / youth; idea improvement; illness and illness, chronic; qualitative analysis; theory development; young adults Initially created by Leon Festinger (1954), social comparison theory is primarily concerned with the ways in which persons examine themselves to other people and to themselves at distinct points in time, plus the consequences of such comparisons. The theory has much in prevalent with reference group theory pioneered by Hyman and Singer (Hyman, 1942; Hyman Singer, 1968) and advanced by sociologists like 1022150-57-7 chemical information 
Merton (1949/1968). It really is not my intention to describe these theories and their myriad applications in detail here; critiques of social comparison theory and its uses are already obtainable (Arigo, Suls, Smyth, 2014; Buunk Gibbons, 2007; Goethals, 1986; Suls, Martin, Wheeler, 2002; Suls Wheeler, 2000). On the other hand, I will briefly describe a few of the crucial concepts that I draw on in this post along with the methods in which they’ve been applied in existing health analysis, to provide the background to the present study as well as the queries it addressed. A important idea developed from Festinger’s (1954) work is the fact that of upward comparisons, whereby men and women compare themselves with other individuals that are perceived to become relatively far better off. 
Festinger believed that this tendency was related having a drive humans have to upwardly evaluate themselves in relation to others’ efficiency (Buunk Gibbons, 2007). Subsequently, folks have been also identified to produce downward comparisons to other folks believed to be worse off or much less fortunate. In accordance with Goethals (1986), this sort of comparison is extra likely to become made by persons who feel threatened, or that have low self-esteem, to boost their personal sense of wellbeing. Wills (1981) proposed that exactly the same affect was accomplished by producing lateral comparisons to other individuals noticed to become at a comparable level in coping with issues; this has also been referred to as parallel comparisons (Bellizzi, Blank, Oakes, 2006). Another set of ideas has been developed that refer to social comparisons produced more than time. Albert (1977) applied the term `temporal comparisons’ to describe how men and women self-evaluate their own efficiency at different points in time. Ultimately, the notion of trajectory comparisons has been utilised to describe how people today examine the shifting states of other individuals more than time (Dibb Yardley, 2006). The above conceptual framework has been used in research examining which sorts of social comparisons folks with medical UPF 1069 situations use and what they achieve within the approach. This function has shown that theseUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UKCorresponding Author: Janet Heaton, University of Exeter Healthcare School, Veysey Developing, Salmon Pool Lane, Exeter, Devon, EX5 5NT, UK. E mail: [email protected] folks generally make downward comparisons to other individuals perceived to become worse off (Affleck, Tennen, Urrows, Higgins, Abeles, 2000; Kay, Davies, Gamsu, Jarman, 2009; Prout, Hayes, Gelder, 1999; Rasmussen, O’Connell, Dunning, Cox, 2007; Schur, Gamsu, Barley, 1999), and that they m.Risons to represent themselves and their experiences towards the target audience. Two new concepts–analogues and foils– are introduced to describe how the young adults likened themselves to, and contrasted themselves with, various reference PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19889398 groups in their accounts. By way of these and connected methods, they made constructive renditions of their experiences for the audience, helping to inform and assistance other folks in the approach. Keywords and phrases adolescents / youth; concept development; illness and disease, chronic; qualitative evaluation; theory improvement; young adults Initially created by Leon Festinger (1954), social comparison theory is primarily concerned using the approaches in which people today examine themselves to others and to themselves at various points in time, along with the consequences of such comparisons. The theory has much in widespread with reference group theory pioneered by Hyman and Singer (Hyman, 1942; Hyman Singer, 1968) and advanced by sociologists like Merton (1949/1968). It really is not my intention to describe these theories and their myriad applications in detail right here; reviews of social comparison theory and its utilizes are already obtainable (Arigo, Suls, Smyth, 2014; Buunk Gibbons, 2007; Goethals, 1986; Suls, Martin, Wheeler, 2002; Suls Wheeler, 2000). Having said that, I’ll briefly describe a few of the important concepts that I draw on in this write-up along with the techniques in which they have been utilized in existing well being study, to supply the background for the present study and the queries it addressed. A essential notion developed from Festinger’s (1954) function is that of upward comparisons, whereby individuals evaluate themselves with other folks that are perceived to be relatively much better off. Festinger believed that this tendency was associated with a drive humans need to upwardly evaluate themselves in relation to others’ overall performance (Buunk Gibbons, 2007). Subsequently, individuals had been also located to produce downward comparisons to other people believed to become worse off or less fortunate. In line with Goethals (1986), this type of comparison is additional likely to become made by individuals who feel threatened, or who’ve low self-esteem, to enhance their individual sense of wellbeing. Wills (1981) proposed that exactly the same have an effect on was accomplished by producing lateral comparisons to other folks seen to be at a equivalent level in coping with troubles; this has also been known as parallel comparisons (Bellizzi, Blank, Oakes, 2006). An additional set of concepts has been created that refer to social comparisons created over time. Albert (1977) employed the term `temporal comparisons’ to describe how people today self-evaluate their own functionality at distinct points in time. Finally, the idea of trajectory comparisons has been utilized to describe how folks compare the shifting states of others over time (Dibb Yardley, 2006). The above conceptual framework has been applied in studies examining which kinds of social comparisons men and women with medical circumstances use and what they attain inside the procedure. This operate has shown that theseUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UKCorresponding Author: Janet Heaton, University of Exeter Health-related School, Veysey Building, Salmon Pool Lane, Exeter, Devon, EX5 5NT, UK. E-mail: [email protected] people frequently make downward comparisons to other individuals perceived to become worse off (Affleck, Tennen, Urrows, Higgins, Abeles, 2000; Kay, Davies, Gamsu, Jarman, 2009; Prout, Hayes, Gelder, 1999; Rasmussen, O’Connell, Dunning, Cox, 2007; Schur, Gamsu, Barley, 1999), and that they m.